With more and more “firearms instructors” popping up I’m starting to get concerned about the aspect of marksmanship. Do instructors provide a service or disservice regarding modern firearms training?
What defines you
Based off the fact I end up spending a large majority correcting bad habits rather than educating I’m going to go with disservice. Don’t get me wrong, we have perfected our corrective strategies, but I would prefer not having to correct so many bad habits. It seems a novelty to training is provide training that is “cool” rather than straight up training. If the cool factor is not there then enrollment can be low and we wouldn’t want that now would we. If you truly are an educator then the performance of your students is the most important aspect, it’s really the basis for your existence.
What is your goal
If you’re a prospective student you better know what you’re getting yourself involved in and more importantly how do you gauge your improvement. If you don’t have a means of monitoring your progress it’s kind of hard to blame the instructor. I’d love more students who were interested in meeting standards, whether you met them or not, just the fact you care about them is huge. To those who are more interested in looking cool rather than being cool, make no mistake it takes hard work and the difference is obvious. You’ve got to put the effort in, nothing is free no matter how creative the marketing.
That’s what we call a clue
As for the instructors out there, are you putting your students first or are you more interested in your own cool factor. When I have a student attend class with major deficiencies that should have been picked up sooner it’s frustrating, add to the equation the names of those instructors and it’s down right disappointing. We have all got to take our game to the next level, if you are having problems dealing with the basics ask yourself if you have any business teaching “advanced” stuff. Of course I realize we cannot be held accountable for every student listening and following our instructions, but patterns can also be what we call a clue.
The short list
So, what are some of the major issues we see in classes. How about sights, knowing how to correctly use your sights and then be able to precisely place a shot on demand. It’s pretty funny I bring this up, but I can’t tell you how many times I see this issue. Trigger management is another one. If I hear someone else say to place the pad of the finger on the trigger I’m going to throat punch someone. You’ve got to work with each student individually to perfect their technique, there is no default except to go deeper than you think. Stance is another one, if you can’t teach a bio mechanically superior position you better learn one quick and yes it’s ok to tell your student they need to get stronger because that really is the unspoken area of improvement within the industry.
Your excuse is invalid
Speaking of getting stronger I look at the industry and question if manufactures are helping or hurting. When I see gadgets or gizmos that are suppose to help, what I see is a manufacturer that promotes weakness. Weakness in the sense it makes folks more reliant on gear than on technique or skill. Just like fad diet pills, there is no substitute for the hard work you have to put in to be good at something.
Again, are we as an industry doing a service by holding our students to a higher standard or are we doing a disservice when we let them skate through training. Yes, that was my RANT MODE on full auto, but I’m sick as a dog so I don’t really care.
"The only place success comes before work is in the dictionary." Vince Lombardi, Greenbay Packers Head Coach